What is the impact of using static locators for elements in a Single Page Application (SPA) on the parallelization of tests or reusing the page context between tests?


Sure, you can use static locators for elements that are always present in a Single Page Application (SPA), like the navigation bar. These locators are efficient and reliable as they target specific elements based on their constant attributes or properties.

Parallelization, or running multiple tests simultaneously, and reusing the page context between tests, which helps maintain state and avoid unnecessary setup steps, won't be significantly impacted by using static locators.

Static locators provide a consistent way of locating elements, which is beneficial for both parallelization and reusability of page contexts. This is because these elements have stable attributes or properties, allowing multiple tests to interact with them without conflicts.

However, be aware that dynamic content within your SPA could affect the reliability of static locators. If parts of your navigation bar change dynamically based on user interactions or other factors, you may need to adjust your locator strategy.

In short, using static locators for consistently present elements like the navigation bar in an SPA is a good practice, provided those elements have stable attributes or properties. It won't negatively impact parallelization of tests or reusing the page context between tests.


Thank you!
Was this helpful?
Still have questions?

If you still have questions, please ask a question and I will try to answer it.

Related Discord Threads

Related Questions

AboutQuestionsDiscord ForumBrowser ExtensionTagsQA Jobs

Rayrun is a community for QA engineers. I am constantly looking for new ways to add value to people learning Playwright and other browser automation frameworks. If you have feedback, email luc@ray.run.